En route to Spain through northern France, I found this parked in a layby. Think they were just having a minute, as there were no facilities there whatsoever!
Oi stop takin the P*ss. Check the figures: the ST has the same all up wieght as and R1100s and has 12 more horses and a balance shaft so its smoother and revs much more freely and therefore is quicker - and by the way having had both models the 1100s would not win any beauty contests either. Oh and I get better MPG from the 1200 y abot 10mpg. So yah boo and sucks.
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity
The Teutonic Tangerine wrote:Oi stop takin the P*ss. Check the figures: the ST has the same all up wieght as and R1100s and has 12 more horses and a balance shaft so its smoother and revs much more freely and therefore is quicker - and by the way having had both models the 1100s would not win any beauty contests either. Oh and I get better MPG from the 1200 y abot 10mpg. So yah boo and sucks.
You should all be ashamed of yourselves, read the above post again, TT makes some good points......bad people
The Teutonic Tangerine wrote:Oi stop takin the P*ss. Check the figures: the ST has the same all up wieght as and R1100s and has 12 more horses and a balance shaft so its smoother and revs much more freely and therefore is quicker - and by the way having had both models the 1100s would not win any beauty contests either. Oh and I get better MPG from the 1200 y abot 10mpg. So yah boo and sucks.
You should all be ashamed of yourselves, read the above post again, TT makes some good points......bad people
the Tiger is definitely prettier though!....
As far as looks are concerned I don't disagree - But you appreciate the bl**dy great headlamp of the ST on a dark night
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity
The Teutonic Tangerine wrote:Oi stop takin the P*ss. Check the figures: the ST has the same all up wieght as and R1100s and has 12 more horses and a balance shaft so its smoother and revs much more freely and therefore is quicker - and by the way having had both models the 1100s would not win any beauty contests either. Oh and I get better MPG from the 1200 y abot 10mpg. So yah boo and sucks.
I think it's well-documented on this forum, that the ST is an overlooked model, that fits the "sports-tourer" slot - very well.
(You have to admit thought- it is the ginger-haired step-child in the BMW family........ )
It's actually less-shonky than the VFR 800 to be honest........
Al
If I am ever on life support - Unplug me......
Then plug me back in..........
The Teutonic Tangerine wrote:the 1100s would not win any beauty contests either
I beg to differ!
I do have to confess that I really like the look of the 12ST. If I was going to buy a sports tourer that's what I'd get.
You beg to differ - So do I its amazing what a bit of lighting can conceal, i.e. cross eyed and one eye half closed.
The guys in our club seem to have gone for the new R1200RS - we have two in the club already and third on order and we only have 30 members
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity
I have discarded the headlamp cowel which came with the bike - why hide your light under a bushel.
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity