Interesting claims.

Pull up a chair - let's talk Boxerbollox

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

boxerscott
Posts: 3724
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: scottish borders
Contact:

Interesting claims.

Post by boxerscott »

The guy selling this rather attractive,

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MOTO-GUZZI-V1 ... 3cffabfab9

Guzzi quotes from a mag claiming that this is a match for the Vtr 1000 ..... Really? anyone had one? I love this model.
Fiat Panda.
Fiat Scudo (with speedblock, pipe carrier, reversing sensors, reversing camera, tow bar, some new rust and Fake Plumber logo)


started out with nothing, still have most of it left.
User avatar
nab 301
Member
Posts: 2375
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Dublin Ireland

Re: Interesting claims.

Post by nab 301 »

boxerscott wrote: Guzzi quotes from a mag claiming that this is a match for the Vtr 1000 ..... Really? anyone had one? I love this model.
Never owned one , I have always lusted after them though . Realistically the Guzzi must be at least 30kg heavier than the Honda with less power.. :wink:
_________________
Nigel

Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you've been up to!
1999 R1100s (mandarin) '
2018 DL 250V Strom
2019 CB125F Honda.
MZ301 Saxon Fun ( currently retired)
'03 Bullet 65 project..
User avatar
eyore
Member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:25 am
Location: Ireland

Re: Interesting claims.

Post by eyore »

Never owned one , I have always lusted after them though . Realistically the Guzzi must be at least 30kg heavier than the Honda with less power.. :wink:[/quote]

R1100S v R 1200S ,whats on paper dosent necessarily translate to the small differences in actual real world road conditions. Lovely bike, go on, goon, go on you know you want to. :lol:
2009 Triumph Speed Triple
2006 Aprilia Tuono RSVR
User avatar
The Teutonic Tangerine
Posts: 1649
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by The Teutonic Tangerine »

Every time I sit on one the cyclinder heads are where my kness want to be.
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic