Are old British classics fun or big disappointments?

Pull up a chair - let's talk Boxerbollox

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

boxerscott
Posts: 3723
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: scottish borders
Contact:

Post by boxerscott »

andy griff wrote:Interesting topic.
I have an R1200S and bought a K1100RS to supplement it. I love it. 1997 and absolutely quick enough, plus modern enough to have good brakes and strong engine. New enough to make spares available and reliable enough to start first time when i go to the garage after a coupe of weeks.

Each to their own, this one scratches my itch for something a bit classic without meaning its always in bits
I agree with you, "modern classic" any day of the week for me.
Fiat Panda.
Fiat Scudo (with speedblock, pipe carrier, reversing sensors, reversing camera, tow bar, some new rust and Fake Plumber logo)


started out with nothing, still have most of it left.
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

oyster wrote:I think it depends entirely on your riding attitude. .............
I think you're right there. Although the brakes on some older stuff will take an awful lot of attitude adjustment!

I'm sure it's been done before, but a thread on what defines "character" in a motorcycle would be good. Be interesting to hear what it means to different people. And whether people generally think modern bikes are devoid of it.

Cheers
Triton
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:37 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland

Post by Triton »

I have a Triton that I have owned since 1978. When you ride it after modern bikes it is a good laugh on country roads. On a dual carriageway it is painful in more weays than one!

David
R1200ST '07, R1100RS '96, F650ST '99, Triton 650 '59
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic