Postby Hoppers » Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:12 am
Here's my view of the IAM/RoSPA debate from my experience as having passed the IAM test, been an IAM Observer, passed RoSPA Gold test for Car and Bike, been a RoSPA Tutor and a Chairman for a local RoSPA group (I'm not trying to big myself up, just giving you an idea of what I've done), some of which I am reiterating what people have already said on this forum.
The Comparison of the IAM and RoSPA passes
I was told my numerous people that an IAM pass was the equivalent of a RoSPA Bronze. I tried hunting down where this came from but I couldn't, it seemed to be 'hear say'. The only reference I found was when I got my first RoSPA test report. In it was an application form to apply for a BTEC in advanced driving (or whatever it was called). You could send them a cheque for a certificate and if you had passed the IAM test or got a RoSPA bronze you got a 'pass' certificate, RoSPA silver got you a 'merit' and a gold got you a distinction'.
I subsequently heard of IAM examiners claiming an IAM pass was the equivalent of a RoSPA silver.
There is now, I believe, an IAM Masters ( I think it used to be the Special Assessment), a friend of mine has done this and he said it is far more challenging than the RoSPA test.
The IAM do 'this' and RoSPA do 'that'
Before I did my RoSPA test some guys at the local IAM group told me that the RoSPA are more focussed on riding slower and more safely, there were other things too but I can't recall. This isn't necessarily true, both the IAM and RoSPA tests are based on Roadcraft and the law. What became apparent to me was that the examiners had different views on what was required to pass each test. I rode the same for my IAM and RoSPA tests.
Talking to the 3 RoSPA examiners for my area, they all had slightly different views on what was required. The younger examiner was more relaxed with each candidates idiosyncrasies, the older one was very strict and quite often knocked down great riders a grade for not doing exactly what he wanted.
RoSPA tutors are better than IAM observers
Having experienced both, there are brilliant observers and god awful tutors and vice versa. The RoSPA tutor, on paper, is a better rider as the minimum requirement to be a tutor is a silver, some groups will only accept gold riders to be tutors. However, a good rider doesn't necessarily mean a good teacher. There is a case to suggest that someone who has struggled to pass a test may be a more sympathetic and understanding teacher for someone similar, when they are undergoing instruction. What's the saying, 'those that can't do, teach'?
The quality of the observers/tutors may also be determined by the group as a whole. The IAM in York had a really good training regime (at the time I was a member), the RoSPA group I subsequently joined hadn't. I tried to change that, but was met with resistance to design a syllabus/training programme and was one of the reasons I left the group.
slparry mentions that he understood the RoSPA Gold is the same as the police Class 1 without the high speed pursuit. I had been told this too, but when I mentioned it to one of the examiners who was a police instructor, he response was similar to that as if I had shat on his lawn, shagged his wife and ridden his motorbike, all without his permission!
IAM/Rospa tutors are amateurs, albeit taking a professional attitude. Police instructors and the police are professionals, as a member of the public (unless you are very fortunate) you will never be able to get the same level of tuition, bearing in mind the legal exemptions afforded when undergoing such training. I would like to suggest that someone who has attained RoSPA Gold could preform well under such training/assessment.
Anyway, the above is my opinion and like all things related to advanced riding/driving you will get 10 different opinions if you ask 10 different people! Why not do both IAM and RoSPA, then if anyone asks you the question you have asked, you can give them an informed answer?
Last edited by
Hoppers on Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.