My ST's had a Remus on from new, this is just taking up space. Limited market, obviously!
£50?
Pete
Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul
Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
Nocto Diuque Venamur
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 3:33 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
Pete, what year is your ST? Is there a part number evident? Any marks, dents etc? Cheers!
2006 R1200S (Magma-Red/titan-silver) - Michelin PR4s, Akrapovic slip-on silencer, Ohlin suspension, Ilmberger Carbon hugger & Carbon valve-covers, Corbin seat.
2010 R1200R
2004 R1200C Montauk
2010 R1200R
2004 R1200C Montauk
Re: Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
I'll have a look in the garage in a bit and let you know!
Pete

Pete
Nocto Diuque Venamur
Re: Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
Photo attached of the markings on the silencer! Part numbers are 7680953/7677524, the parts fiche shows them as for the ST and RT, but not the R. There are no dings/dents/scratches, perhaps the odd little mark from storage, but the sort that will polish off.
Pete
Pete
Nocto Diuque Venamur
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 3:33 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
Re: Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
Thought it might have been for my 2010 R1200R, part no. 18127687339 or 18127702444. Cheers mate!
2006 R1200S (Magma-Red/titan-silver) - Michelin PR4s, Akrapovic slip-on silencer, Ohlin suspension, Ilmberger Carbon hugger & Carbon valve-covers, Corbin seat.
2010 R1200R
2004 R1200C Montauk
2010 R1200R
2004 R1200C Montauk
Re: Original 1200RT/ST silencer
Ahh, shame, sorry about that - I always thought the R shared the same one as the ST/RT, obviously not!
Pete

Pete
Nocto Diuque Venamur
- The Teutonic Tangerine
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
Re: Original 1200RT/ST/R silencer
As the ST was only about from 2005 to 2007 I doubt they changed anything fundamental like the exhaust.Justcruising wrote:Pete, what year is your ST? Is there a part number evident? Any marks, dents etc? Cheers!
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity