
http://www.bikeexif.com/harley-xr1200
now just why can't HD produce something like this instead of the tedious 1950's styled tacky things?
Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul
But that's the appeal of Harleys.slparry wrote: now just why can't HD produce something like this instead of the tedious 1950's styled tacky things?
The XR to go for is the "X" version.Twinspark wrote:I bike journo. friend has described the 11S as 'a little bit naughty'. Can't say I disagree with that.
The XR1200, I agree, is kind of a Harley 'little bit naughty' bike.
I really want one - but I just can't justify any more toys!
Totally agree.Dai wiskers wrote:Steve being totally honest with you out that K and get a Harley
You would be surprised at the mileage you can do in a day when we were getting John ready for his iron butt run I was better after the day's on the harley than the bm the harley is so comfy it really is like sitting in a sofa now I've changed the seat i was a bit too far back with the standard seat but now it fits me great
I've been a harley hater since the 70's but now they make sense a big motor in a simple twin shoc frame (i really don't like the softtail frame to me they don't feel right they seem to wallow )
Buy something sorted and you'll be okay preferably from someone desperate for the cash
EDIT. I was out a couple of weeks ago on the harley with two other harley owners one was a 1976 shovel one was a 1987 evo we were joined by another mate on his streetfightered Triumph triple (not sure of model ) we called into a bar on the way home the lad on the Triumph turned round and said FFS you lot don't hang around i was expecting a bimble not a thrash
I hired a 1600cc HD in the USA for a weekend once, it and a previously ridden 1981 Triumph Bonneville, were the worst two bikes I've ridden in 40 years of riding, both were truely hideous. The HD was just plain gultess and ill handling, the Triumph had no redeeming features whatever and shook the fingers off my watch!bikesnbones wrote:Totally agree.Dai wiskers wrote:Steve being totally honest with you out that K and get a Harley
You would be surprised at the mileage you can do in a day when we were getting John ready for his iron butt run I was better after the day's on the harley than the bm the harley is so comfy it really is like sitting in a sofa now I've changed the seat i was a bit too far back with the standard seat but now it fits me great
I've been a harley hater since the 70's but now they make sense a big motor in a simple twin shoc frame (i really don't like the softtail frame to me they don't feel right they seem to wallow )
Buy something sorted and you'll be okay preferably from someone desperate for the cash
EDIT. I was out a couple of weeks ago on the harley with two other harley owners one was a 1976 shovel one was a 1987 evo we were joined by another mate on his streetfightered Triumph triple (not sure of model ) we called into a bar on the way home the lad on the Triumph turned round and said FFS you lot don't hang around i was expecting a bimble not a thrash
I rode Sportster 883 a while back and it was one of the sweetest bikes I've ever ridden.
Sadly, some people simply cannot get passed their blinkered preconceptions.
Same goes for BMW's.
I know people who will never see BMW as anything other than a bike for doddering old farts.
Their loss, (as I guess a lot of Harley owners also say)