Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:49 pm
Perhaps, but I've still been more happy with longevity of the finish and the reliability of the two BMWs that I have had (R850R and R1100s) than with my previous Yamahas
The UK-based forum for BMW's sportiest Boxer motorcycles
http://w.boxertrix.com/phpBB2/
Joking aside , have they sorted the problems with stones etc punching holes in the belts and how awkward are the belts to fit ?Gromit wrote:adamski49 wrote:
Belt's the way to go though - smooth, zero maintenance, long-lasting, quiet, clean (no lube needed) and lighter than a chain. In fact my perfect bike would be...
.
It'll never flynab 301 wrote:Gromit wrote:Joking aside , have they sorted the problems with stones etc punching holes in the belts and how awkward are the belts to fit ?adamski49 wrote:
Belt's the way to go though - smooth, zero maintenance, long-lasting, quiet, clean (no lube needed) and lighter than a chain. In fact my perfect bike would be...
.
Nigel B
boxerpan wrote:nab 301 wrote:Gromit wrote:
Shouldn't be different to a chain - do you not just remove the swingarm? Or have I missed something?boxerpan wrote:[and belts can't be easily changed for altering the gearing for different racetracks.
Nigel - During its development, they had the Ulysses belt drive system on a test rig and continually fired pebbles at it to try and break it but no damage was done. The newer belt system's designed to eject stones before they can harm the belt, apparently. Biggest problem from belts snapping on the earlier XB's stemmed from tyre fitters allowing the belt to twist whilst removing the rear wheel. This causes the belt to de-laminate, seriously weakening it.nab 301 wrote:
Joking aside , have they sorted the problems with stones etc punching holes in the belts and how awkward are the belts to fit ?
Nigel B
I believe the main problem is that no one makes enough different size pulleys to give differing final drive ratios. Similarly to what Lloyd said, no one races with a belt drive bike, so no one makes the stuff to supply them.Archie wrote:
Shouldn't be different to a chain - do you not just remove the swingarm? Or have I missed something?
A Firebolt belt's itro of 180 quid, although because they don't wear, the pulleys don't need changing.Archie wrote:The chain is a lot narrower - but being a sceptic I guess a chain & sprockets must cost less than a belt & pulleys.
You are correct, but I guess we're here cos the S is different so haven't been snared by the roadracer logic therefore can look at things more objectivelyGromit wrote:
Lloyd - you're right. Racing sells bikes, but as usual it doesn't always bring about a more relevant product for the road.
It doesn't surprise me - I have it on good authority that a certain HD dealer not a million miles from me had several XB belts go ping before they realised what was causing the problem.herrman wrote:I can confirm that tyre fitters caused the early XB belt problems allthough it was the fitter in a H/D dealers workshop(?) that caused mine to fail.
Of course!!boxerpan wrote:
I guess we're here cos the S is different so haven't been snared by the roadracer logic therefore can look at things more objectively![]()