Torque

Pull up a chair - let's talk Boxerbollox

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

User avatar
Merecat
Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Post by Merecat »

Having pondered this for several seconds, my brain has returned a null pointer exception.
At the moment all my attention is fully taken with Eve Muirhead and Anna Sloan (and the other two)
Normal service may not be resumed for a while :shock:
Mick

2001 R1100s Frost Blue

Its not going the fastest,

Its stopping the quickest
tanneman
Member
Posts: 1203
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Terra Firma

Post by tanneman »

You have finally figured it out. It is all theory.
'Let me check my concernometer.'
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

tanneman wrote:You have finally figured it out. It is all theory.
Very ancient theory, by all accounts.

Staggering to think just how many thousands of years ago.
User avatar
Boxermed69
Member
Posts: 1282
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:28 am
Location: Costa del Weymouth

Post by Boxermed69 »

Corvus wrote:
tanneman wrote:You have finally figured it out. It is all theory.
Very ancient theory, by all accounts.

Staggering to think just how many thousands of years ago...
...this thread started :D
Horizontally opposed, vertically challenged...
Image
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

Boxermed69 wrote:
Corvus wrote:
tanneman wrote:You have finally figured it out. It is all theory.
Very ancient theory, by all accounts.

Staggering to think just how many thousands of years ago...
...this thread started :D
I am deeply chagrined. :?
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

Corvus wrote:
Corvus wrote:
tanneman wrote:Infinite, it is used only for calculations. You would not be able to see it with the naked eye, that is why the theory regarding physics, chemistry and maths works.
It's a very weird place!

Dimensionless, except for length (unless it is an infinitely thin disc! )

Going back to my question "is there any place on a spinning disc or shaft where the angular velocity is zero?". If the centre is at infinity then every part of the disc will experience angular velocity! And yet books tell you that the centre is motionless. Go figure!

Is infinity truly the right expression for the centre? We never reach infinity and yet the centre or axis "point" must be there?
I suppose it is the same for any "point"on a scale. The actual position itself doesn't have a dimension. It does on our steel rule or tape, so that we can see it. But in the theoretical sense it doesn't.

Weird!

Fascinating.
Blimey corvus, if you think that's weird what about time? We like to split time up into chunks, the same way we do with distance (space). So just how small a fraction is "now"?
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

Corvus wrote:
Corvus wrote:
Corvus wrote: It's a very weird place!

Dimensionless, except for length (unless it is an infinitely thin disc! )

Going back to my question "is there any place on a spinning disc or shaft where the angular velocity is zero?". If the centre is at infinity then every part of the disc will experience angular velocity! And yet books tell you that the centre is motionless. Go figure!

Is infinity truly the right expression for the centre? We never reach infinity and yet the centre or axis "point" must be there?
I suppose it is the same for any "point"on a scale. The actual position itself doesn't have a dimension. It does on our steel rule or tape, so that we can see it. But in the theoretical sense it doesn't.

Weird!

Fascinating.
Blimey corvus, if you think that's weird what about time? We like to split time up into chunks, the same way we do with distance (space). So just how small a fraction is "now"?

Er........
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

A perfect cone. Just how narrow is the very tip. Infinity? Or zero?

Somebody ought to take a look at these bloody axioms. They need sorting out. :scratch:
SP250
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Shropshire

Post by SP250 »

Ah - but which way up is the cone?.............
And does it really matter?
John M
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

SP250 wrote:Ah - but which way up is the cone?.............
And does it really matter?
The pointy end.

I'm imagining a representation of a cone rather than a solid, so I guesss it could equally apply to a triangle. I'm using perfect lines, so they'd be infinitely thin. If we follow the cone to the end then continue on, then at some point the cone won't be there. But at that instant, how small is the pointy bit?

it seems to be both infinity and zero!

You can tell I'm no mathematician.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic