Dai wiskers wrote:Today we seem to accept these problems and i don't know why a few years ago Steve would have inserted it into his dealers ass
Steve can you imagine what would have happened if you had sold a Kawasaki that had a list of faults like this the turbo's were bad but bloody hell
I put 80,000 +miles on my old BSA with only routine maintenance ok i put new shells in and bushes at about 50,000 when the sludge trap blocked the shells were showing slight coppering and scoring no need for a crank grind though
I'll say it again if I was doing high milage i would look for a R80 or a R100 as I feel that these are the best bikes BMW have ever made
Perhaps I should use my R80RS more and get rid of the K
I actually went into the shed last night and fired the R80 up, it's been a few months since I did so last. It has a trickle charger on it and fair play full choke, first hit of the button off the old girl went and just sat there idling away, which given it was built in 1985 and registered in 87 is not bad
The F650 is left outside most of the time, and is used in all weathers including deep snow, and just keeps on working, OK I recently had to put a voltage regulator on it, but its switches etc all continue to function even though it's a 1998 machine.
The K .... I love it, it's stupendously fast and it's never failed to get me somewhere, it's just components have failed constantly, the fuel strip is now the only part that's not been replaced (from the Big Book of K failures) .... now to be honest my argument with the fuel strips is BMW have had problems across the range with them, RT's GS's etc. to the point that they binned them and went back to floats, I know the K13GT has a float not a strip. So my reasoning is if mine fails then I feel BMW should replace the fuel tank with a K13 version in order that I can have a float as by the fact they've given up on the technology they've proven it not fit for purpose as defined in the Sales of Goods Act. ... am I wrong?