Hi,
Finally got my bike back together and MOT'd after about 7 months off the road.
Only one problem now, its really lumpy at low revs, it fine at higher engine speeds but I'm having to rev it and slip the clutch a lot to pull away.
What/where should I check first?
Thanks,
Jon
R1200S misfire/lumpy at low revs
Moderators: Gromit, Paul, slparry
I'd hazard a guess at a stick coil having gone. Easy to check - while the engine's ticking over, disconnect the low-tension lead from each coil in turn and see if there's any difference in the engine sound. I parked my ST up one November, it had been running fine - dug it out the following March, symptoms just like yours.
I always carry a spare main, and one of each of the secondaries now.
Pete
I always carry a spare main, and one of each of the secondaries now.
Pete
Nocto Diuque Venamur
On mine, it was definitely more noticeable at lower revs - slipping the clutch was the only way I could set off without the bike feeling like it was going to stall. I could also feel it at higher revs, the bike just didn't feel as if it had as much 'go' as it should have done.
Definitely worth checking.
Pete
Definitely worth checking.
Pete
Nocto Diuque Venamur
-
- Member
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:35 am
- Location: North East
Mine felt like that after I'd rode my GS for some time then I was reminded about the R1200s throttle and the need to give it a handful when setting off but it did feel a little odd. Throttle bodies were balanced and tappets done. Next up is a re map
'15 R1200GS TE
'06 R1200S
'04 BCR
Yam SR 500 long term restoration
wanna win the lottery and ride my bike
'06 R1200S
'04 BCR
Yam SR 500 long term restoration
wanna win the lottery and ride my bike
- The Teutonic Tangerine
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
Are the bungs still on the stubs that you attach the tubes for a vacuum meter to? Maybe bleeding air in to one or other throttle body?
There would appear to be a surfeit of prolixity and sesquipedalian content today please do not use a big word when a singularly un-loquacious and diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish the contemporary necessity
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests