Rear Hugger

Any bike-related products/services you wish to recommend.

Moderators: Gromit, Paul, slparry

NA1959
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: Nord Ireland

Rear Hugger

Postby NA1959 » Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:22 pm

:lol: Just fairly new to the site and have just bought a 2003 twin spark 1100S.

Just to raise an old subject about a rear hugger! :roll:

I am aware that this subject has been discused before and there are several huggers on the market! :?

However, I am toren between on what fits? I have seen a small hugger that attached simply with two screws below the shock like the ART hugger.

Or the other options that fit to the rear brake. I'm not sure what way to go as I do not want to tamper with the brake caliper as I have read in other articles that they can work loose!

Also a carbon rear hugger for the shock mount is about £65 while the caliper mount one is about £160.

Money is not the problem - more ease of fitting ,long term use, style of the hugger and practiacl use of keeping the dirt at bay!

Any suggestions on both options? What are the pros and cons! :? :?

Thanks for your help
Over 40 and flying low ---------

User avatar
andrew s
Member
Posts: 1264
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Fife Scotland

Postby andrew s » Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:39 pm

I think this is a post for Sandbar, so I would say go for the Ilmberger.

Andrew :roll:
A man can fall many times in life but is never a failure until he refuses to get up

User avatar
Me-109
Posts: 863
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Trauma Ward

Postby Me-109 » Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:43 pm

You need sandbar! Recently ordered my hugger from him (doesn't everyone?) having had a quick look around and I'm not disappointed. Yes, it is a bit more expensive than that shock-mount one, but do you really want to trust that long hugger flapping around over a rapidly rotating wheel by two 4mm screws? :?

The quality is great, mounting is solid, delivery was swift and a Viffer rider that's just bought some bits off my Bandit commented on how much better the quality was than the one on his 800.

You know you want to.... :wink:

User avatar
boxerpan
Posts: 2234
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:48 pm
Location: waving, not drowning. Warwicks

Re: Rear Hugger

Postby boxerpan » Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:04 am

NA1959 wrote::lol: ...........while the caliper mount one is about £160.


Didn't think Sandbar charged that much for the Ilmberger :oops: Tis good anyway, just torque the caliper bolts back up to the correct spec.
Some folks get on OK with the Pyramid hugger :wink:
Lloyd

It's not how fast you ride, it's how you ride fast.
Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear
bright until you hear them speak.

sandbar
Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:08 pm

Re: Rear Hugger

Postby sandbar » Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:51 am

boxerpan wrote:Didn't think Sandbar charged that much for the Ilmberger :oops:


There is a special Trixter price :shock: PM me!!

The trouble with the ones that fit to the shock is that the two puny little screws actually hold the device against the bottom spring holder to reduce the flapping about. Very soon that holder frets away at the carbon and wears a nice groove in it and then the whole thing starts to wave around a lot and eventually hits the underside of the seat. :shock: Also they do not fit onto aftermarket shocks!!!

The Pyramid one apparently needs a bit of fettling (see the hilarious recent 'Group Buy' on Pelican :lol: :lol: ). Lloyd can tell you that you may also need to do a bit of work on the attachment screws!!

Yes - Yes- Yes - I know - vested interest and all that - I would say that wouldn't I???

sandbar

Stevie
Member
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 1:43 pm
Location: Kinross

Postby Stevie » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:03 pm

I have a Pyramid one (plastic, resources don't stretch to CF), and I have had absolutely no problem with it other than having to check the mounting screws every now and again, as they can work loose. This has only happened once in about 7000 miles, and I reckon that the shop that did the last tyre change didn't torque them up too well.

User avatar
Dog Tyred
Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: Tamuff

Postby Dog Tyred » Mon Mar 06, 2006 4:08 pm

Its amazing how often this question comes up. Check out the post 'Same old hugger question..........again!' in the 'Boxertech forum (last post 1st Feb 06 - i think)

Lots of sound advice in there and I still aint made me mind u yet!
Ride like your life depended on it.

2002 BCR

speedmachine
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Cleveland Stockton on Tees

Postby speedmachine » Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:37 pm

I too fitted Ilmberger but it snapped in half. Last year
On the way to Moto GP in Holland, could not stop to pick it up. :cry:
But apparently, the carbon mud guard was shattere,
so decided to try pyramid hugger pain to line up with rear wheel,
but spot-on, now :wink:

User avatar
Dog Tyred
Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: Tamuff

Postby Dog Tyred » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:23 pm

Yo Sandbar. I've finally found the 'group buy' thread on Pelican. Fantastic reading, filled my hole lunch hour :D

Ilmberger hugger not flavour of the month with our brothers across the pond. Then again, neither was the Pyramid come to that. Would you care to enlighten?
Ride like your life depended on it.



2002 BCR

sandbar
Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:08 pm

Postby sandbar » Tue Mar 07, 2006 9:56 pm

Nu2beemers wrote: Would you care to enlighten?


I would be delighted to. However it will be lengthy and it might not interest too many.

We live in a mechanical world and occasionally things go wrong and things break. Ilmberger huggers have long been covered by an 'if it breaks - it will be replaced' warranty and there is not really a time limit on that. Within reason and abuse not withstanding!!

The total returns for this design of hugger is still less than 1%.

Of those returned, nearly all of them showed signs of not being fitted correctly, most of the others had been subject to serious abuse. Like the guy who drilled extra holes in the support arm because he wanted it even lighter still or the other guy who pop rivetted rubber strips all around because he thought it was not wide enough.

The Pelican issue seems to revolve round a guy who dealt in used car parts in the U.S.A. He bought some huggers, particularly for the R1100S, from a source inside Germany. He never dealt with Ilmberger or Wunderlich ( it is the same product). He sold them in the U.S. without any instructions or customer service. At that time the only official importer into the U.S.A was through the Wunderlich network. There were a number of problems and his customers were basically told to f*ck off!!

This started an avalanche of hysterical comment on 'Pelican'. Soon afterwards Ilmberger heard about it all and found out the route via which these huggers were being sold. They sent out an unsolicited and unpaid for batch of huggers to this guy with the message that they were to be used to replace any broken ones F.O.C. on the basis that the broken ones were to be returned to Germany for examination. In hindsight it was an incredibly naive thing to do. Perhaps unsurprisingly no broken huggers were returned via this route and of course the replacements were never seen again. Nor were they ever paid for!!!

It is worth saying that there were negligible returns or complaint through the Wunderlich network!!

A couple of the (Pelican)people with problems sent their huggers direct to Ilmberger in Germany. One of the broken ones was submitted to the TUV authorities in Germany for detailed technical examination. Their report blamed incorrect fitting, and recommended increasing the emphasis on the fitting intructions and making more efforts to ensure that every customer received proper instructions. One of the others was reassembled on to a bike. Here is a picture of that. I am not prepared to comment on how and why it was fitted like that. I know - but I must leave you to use your own imagination.

Image

Most of the other complainants would not or could not return their broken ones for replacement. One of the most regular critics ( never missed an opportunity to have a go at Ilmberger or to 'bump' up an anti thread) was unable or unwilling to 'put up', even when challenged to by a couple of guys from this board. Neither were his friends. He had reported a 100% failure rate in his town(city??). Yeah right!!!!!

The whole point of the fitting instructions - apart from what to fasten where - is to tell you to remove the plastic OE shock protector. This is because the hugger is likely to make regular contact with it. In any event there is no point in having it in situ, because if it did any good then you might not be wanting a hugger. If you think on from that, a number of aftermarket shock absorbers have springs of larger diameter than the OE shock. This needs to be taken into account.

As I said earlier, nearly all the returned huggers showed signs of contact with either the shock protector or an aftermarket shock. Not one of the Pelican complainants who claimed that their broken hugger showed no signs of this contact was ever returned.

There is a lot more to say, but I don't want to exhaust the patience of other Trixters any more.

But just think how much amusement I got out of reading about the recent 'group buy' of the opposition product :twisted: :twisted:

If you want to ask any more specific questions then PM me. As you can tell - I am happy to discuss it.

By the way, have a look on Pelican at the pictures of their bikes. You will see that a lot of them are still running Ilmberger huggers. As they would like to say - go figure!!!

sandbar

User avatar
Dog Tyred
Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: Tamuff

Postby Dog Tyred » Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Cheers Sandbar. I much appreciate the full and honest explaination. I think it will have to be a Ilmberger hugger for me then! Just need to save up. I hope to see a few out at the Wales bash later this month.

With regard to the Pelican 'group buy' thread, it really does make fantastic reading and I bet your smile got bigger and bigger the further you read. You can just picture the face of the original guy who set up the 'group buy' changing as realisation sets in that all these other guys who bought a $200 P*****d hugger on his recommendation are beginning to wonder what the f*****g hell they have let themselves in fore. The photos are brill and the guy (Scott I think) who cherps in mid way through that he new all about the fitting problems two years earlier but nobody listened. Absolutely priceless.

And the moral of this story? Keep ones opinions to yourself :roll:
Ride like your life depended on it.



2002 BCR

User avatar
boxerpan
Posts: 2234
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:48 pm
Location: waving, not drowning. Warwicks

Postby boxerpan » Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:49 pm

Nu2beemers wrote:

And the moral of this story? Keep ones opinions to yourself :roll:


Nah....just say what you think and be prepared to don a hard hat when the sh*t starts to fly.
Lloyd



It's not how fast you ride, it's how you ride fast.

Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear

bright until you hear them speak.

User avatar
boxerpan
Posts: 2234
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:48 pm
Location: waving, not drowning. Warwicks

Postby boxerpan » Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:57 pm

The fact that a lot of riders in the States use 'roads' that are little more than gravel tracks more suited to a GS doesn't help any hugger of the cantilever type and ever the main roads are sectional concrete which can set up some nasty vibes over hundreds of miles.
The original Ilmberger had less metal around the brake caliper mounting but the problem of them fatiguing seems to have been sorted with the updated design - unless anyone's had difficulties unknown to this board ?
Lloyd



It's not how fast you ride, it's how you ride fast.

Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear

bright until you hear them speak.

sandbar
Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 7:08 pm

Postby sandbar » Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:53 am

boxerpan wrote:The fact that a lot of riders in the States use 'roads' that are little more than gravel tracks more suited to a GS doesn't help any hugger of the cantilever type


My personal opinion is that this may well have had something to do with the problem, however Ilmberger point out that there are plenty of areas where some of the roads are as bad if not worse than the U.S.A. For example places in Eastern Europe, Australia and Africa.

I think it runs deeper than that. Remember most of this comes from a board where there has recently been a thread about having an extra fuel tank mounted exposed on top of the pillion seat :shock: :shock: and I remember some time ago another guy showing pictures of his 1100S with his tents and sleeping bags hung loosely BELOW the panniers.

It is summed up by a question to me from an existing Australian customer. He asked "Is there really a problem or is it just another case of the 'good ole boys' f*cking it up again". In this case it was nothing to do with the R1100S - it was an issue that seemingly applied only in the U.S.A. and again revolved around a lack of instructions supplied to the customer.

boxerpan wrote:.........fatiguing seems to have been sorted with the updated design


The TUV report stated that the fatiguing was caused by repeated contact with the OE shock protector.

Remember - Ilmberger have not seen a single broken hugger that does not show evidence of regular contact with either the shock protector or a larger shock spring.

sandbar

User avatar
Harry
Member
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Home of the Saints

Postby Harry » Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:44 am

Sanbar,
a serious question on this. You know cos I've posted it before that my hugger was fitted 3 years ago by the Wunderlich agent, and that they left the OE cover in place. As a result I have the traditional 10p sized hole in the leading face of the hugger.
However, because of the hole I have left the OE cover in place to continue protecting the shock.

Are you saying that by doing this I am increasing the risk that it will fail in some way? I had hoped that 'the damage is all done'. What's the solution?

thanks, harry.


Return to “Recommended products/services”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests