KTM SM Test-ride

An opportunity to show your bikes in all their glory

Moderators: Gromit, Paul, slparry

User avatar
stoney
Member
Posts: 2611
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Leeds, West Yorks

KTM SM Test-ride

Postby stoney » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:50 pm

Image

Well tried both the new 690SM and 950SMR today, with my wife as she was considering a change from the GS. Here's what we thought - sorry its a bit rushed - I hate typing!

Image
690SM. The missus hated it. Weord really as she loved the 640. After about 5 miles she kicked me off the 950 and we swapped over.

Initally I hated it too, but we had atest-ride booked so I percervered. it took a while but after blasting back home on my favourite twisteies faster than I ever have done before I thought it was loads of fun.

Its much smoother than the 640 but still unmistakably a big single and vibes still abound but on a much more acceptable level. It feels jerky at low speeds as the throttle is very snatchy at low-revs and the brakes are so powerful. On the move it really brings out the worst in me, as with all singles you have to really wind-it on and then the thing really shifts. Grip and cornering are totally confidence inspiring, the thing just leans and leans which means you can carry so much speed through the corners, sit the thing up and head for the next one, lean it over and hammer around. The brakes are awesome although the back brake is a bit full-on, maybe just seems that way as the rear brake on the GS is so pants.

It'd make a great second/third bike for quick blasts, but the rock-hard seat and wind blast over 60/70mph would make it a pain in the neck even for a decent half-day ride.

Loads of fun, I have one if I had £6k knocking about for a third bike - which I don't

Oh - it sounds rubbish, its needs the full Akro system on there - another £1k maybe?

Image
950SM. This was much more like it! Loads of good smooth power on tap, I imagine it could wheelie for fun in every gear, and despite its extra weight and bulk (it feels almost as heavy as GS - which is about right considering its 8kg lighter) it handled nearly as well as the 690. Much comfier than the 690 and I guess it's be up to longer rides, maybe with a better saddle and a screen, but as stock it seemed that its place ina garage is as a second/third bike and not an everyday bike. I'd hate to sit on motorway at 80 for more than 10 minutes on it.

Overall, much, much better than the 690, but not as much fun on real twistes. Still not as accomplished as the GS but a lot more involving....maybe a little too involving for my missus as her only bike, so she's sticking with the GS for now.

Both great fun bikes that would make fantastic fun/alternative bikes. If I was after such a bike I think I'd go for the 690, but that might just be because I spent more time on it than the 950.
Andy

User avatar
bigblackfalco
Posts: 1922
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:05 am
Location: Darkest Aberdeenshire

Postby bigblackfalco » Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:59 pm

Nice report mate. Who ever designed those upswept silencers needs shooting; must've taken the idea from one of those fancy american rigs!
Any KTM with an Akra on it sounds great, but the V twin is always best.
Bailey.
Honda VFR750 FV 1997 Red and dirty, 130K miles.

Honda VFR800 Xf Crossrunner 2016 White and dirty, 120K miles.

User avatar
stoney
Member
Posts: 2611
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Leeds, West Yorks

Postby stoney » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:05 pm

bigblackfalco wrote:Who ever designed those upswept silencers needs shooting;


You're not wrong there. Also, I can't work out why they look so similar, you'd have thought they'd make them easier to distinguish, even with graphics or something.
Andy

User avatar
Gromit
Posts: 5702
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Lincs, me duck

Postby Gromit » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:13 pm

Andy - reckon the 950SM's one of the nicest bikes I've ridden in the last couple of years, but as you rightly say, it'd only be any good as a 2nd/3rd bike.

If you get the chance, have a quick spin on a SuperDuke; bonkers it is. :shock:

User avatar
stoney
Member
Posts: 2611
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Leeds, West Yorks

Postby stoney » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:21 pm

Gromit wrote:If you get the chance, have a quick spin on a SuperDuke; bonkers it is. :shock:


They do look good I must admit - I'd probably die on something that powerful!

I don't reckon that dealer will be too happy to let me borrow there's - I've test-ridded about 4 bikes from them and not bought so much as a can of lube from them :oops:

As I left the dealer, a mate turned up to collect his brand-new shiny '07 R1 - I was a tad jelous to say the least.
Andy

User avatar
Gromit
Posts: 5702
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Lincs, me duck

Postby Gromit » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:27 pm

stoney wrote:
They do look good I must admit - I'd probably die on something that powerful!


You'd be fine! :) I would say that the Superduke must be the motorcycling equivalent of being wired into mains electricity. Sure, R1, Gixxer thou et al are quicker but the KTM is just so direct it's unreal.

stoney wrote:I don't reckon that dealer will be too happy to let me borrow there's - I've test-ridded about 4 bikes from them and not bought so much as a can of lube from them :oops:


You may do...one day...perhaps ;)

stoney wrote:
As I left the dealer, a mate turned up to collect his brand-new shiny '07 R1 - I was a tad jelous to say the least.


Nice...very. If it's the white/red one I'll be even more jealous.

User avatar
stoney
Member
Posts: 2611
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Leeds, West Yorks

Postby stoney » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:12 am

Gromit wrote:Nice...very. If it's the white/red one I'll be even more jealous.


Na, it was the understated dark blue - it looked really good.
Andy

User avatar
Gromit
Posts: 5702
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Lincs, me duck

Postby Gromit » Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:45 am

stoney wrote:Na, it was the understated dark blue - it looked really good.


Aha - I'll check that one out, not seen that colour yet.

User avatar
PBBoxer
Posts: 3211
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Postby PBBoxer » Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:34 pm

I ride Marcus's 950 sm a fair bit. Like you say, it's got lovely solid power delivery. He's just had some woprk done with teh needles etc and it's picked up 11bhp!
I rode th superduke last week. Bloody hell. Makes the 950sm feel civilised, to say teh least. To be honest I found teh SuperDuke a but intimidatiing, as the steering was SOOOO quick and it felt a bit short for me. They both feel like you're riding a bar stool, very very short and quite high, but oh so nimble
1997 CBR1100XXV
1999 CBR1100XX
2009 HP2 Sport
2006 R1200s
2013 R1200RT anniversary

User avatar
Gromit
Posts: 5702
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Lincs, me duck

Postby Gromit » Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:39 pm

What PB said re the S/Dook v the SM. How 2 bikes, with fundamentally the same motor, can feel so different comes as quite a shock. The S/D seems to have absolutely no inertia - especially from the steering which has no resistance at all. In the right hands it'd be awesome, but it's waaaaay too full-on for me.

The SM on the other hand is a total peach.

Love the look of the S/D though. :)

I mean, how much of a nasty b*stard does this thing look...

Image

Makes a Striple look like a CG125.


Return to “Boxerpix”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests